|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
| Time | Description |
|---|---|
| 10:30 | Begin water flow into well |
| 10:33 | Initial rate is 50 gpm |
| 10:36 | Adjust rate to 30 gpm |
| 10:43 | Start injection of 500 ml of 50% fluorescein dye solution |
| 10:45 | Injection of dye complete |
| 10:46 | Stop water flow due to approaching train |
| 10:52 | Resume water flow at 30 gpm |
| 13:05 | Notice flow of water has decreased to 23 gpm, re-adjust back to 30 gpm |
| 14:00 | Flush test terminated, water flow stopped |
The flushing water had a conductivity of 175 mS/cm and a temperature of 20.2ø C at the well.
Table 1 lists the results for the dye analysis at Illinois Central Spring. Table 2 lists the dye results at the Stony East and West Springs. Table 3 lists the results for the Valhalla wells. Table 4 lists the results for the east side wells. Table 5 lists the results for MW-4i, which had the automatic sampler.
Figure 1 shows the dye and conductivity results at MW-4i. Conductivity values were rising in the well until the rain event beginning on July 19 shortly after 0800 hours. There is a slight decline in conductivity in MWr4i and a corresponding slight rise in fluorescein. It is a very slight breakthrough curve with a maximum dye differential of only 0.7 ppb.
Figure 2 is a plot of Illinois Central Spring flow from the SRS sump fill data. There is a slight displacement of flow upwards coinciding with the water injection times indicating, a pressure-pulse displacement of water to Illinois Central Spring. This indicates a hydraulic connection from the well to the spring. Average llo\v divas about 49() Ppm \vhicl1 would translate to a travel time from site to spring of 6 to 8 hours based on the storm flow regression equation. The tracer should have arrived at Illinois Central Spring between 1700 and 1900 hours on 6/18/2003. However, once again, there is no indication from dye concentration or conductivity of that arrival.
An inspection of Table 2 indicates no dye detection at either of the Stony Springs. The increase in fluorescence after the 6/19/2003 storm is storm background and turbidity.
Figure 3 shows the datalogger elevation water data for all wells collected from 6/17/2003 through 6/20/2003. Figure 4 shows the relative change due to the flushing water taking the last reading of the datalogger before flushing began. Figure 5 shows the hand measured data taken during the flush at 00-370. Maximum water level rise in 00-370 was 4.15 feet. Table 7 shows each well and its distance from 00-370 and the maximum water level rise measured. In a homogeneous and isotropic medium the maximum water level change would vary proportionally to the distance from the injection well. Discrepancies in that variation should reveal the anisotropic variation in the aquifer.
MW-6 and NN-700 stand out because there appears to be more rise in those wells than their distance to 00-370 would account for. Because NN-300, 00-300, and MW-BI are all screened in the lower phreatic zone, a better connection between MW-6 and 00-370 may exist in an upper phreatic conduit. The connection between NN-700 and 00-370 seems even better developed given that distance. In the October 2002 dye traces, cosine injected in NN-700 was detected first in 00-370.
The current theory concerning the results obtained from this dye test and flush is that the dye was pushed into conduits low in the well in the 795-800 zone, but that most of the water actually flowed out an upper level phreatic conduit (conduits are visible at 817 and 814 in the video log of the well). This would explain the lack of dye recovery and yet the increase in flow at Illinois Central Spring. This implies that the 795-800 zone near this well is interconnected to the aquifer feeding the spring but not an active flow zone or such a large reservoir that 5,000 gallons cannot push the dye from this area. Another dye injection with the lower zone blocked off will be attempted from this well to detemmine if upper level conduits exist that will take appreciable water.
The MW-4I area on the eastern edge of the landfill has historically shown low water levels. This is especially true of MW-4S and MW-4I. MW-4S has always shown the lowest level of any phreatic well. This well is screened in a higher phreatic zone than most other wells around the site. It has not been clear if this lower water level is indicative of upwelling from the 795-800 zone or if it is just an anomaly caused by a lack of or poor connection to the main water bearing units. The well does respond to events such as pumping of the 795-800 zone and some connection surely does exist. The goal of the well modification was to block off the lower /tones of a well on either side ol MW-5S to see if they would then indicate a lower water level like MW-4S.
Wells MW- 17 and MW-20 were modified the week of 7/28/2003. Well MW-17 was obstructed at an elevation of approximately 803 to 807 feet amsl. The well was cleared of the obstructions and then filled with hcntonite chips to yield a heal depth to bottom of approximately 801 feet amsl Well MW-20 had no obstructions and was f~llcd with bentonite chips to a new bottom elevation of approximately 801 feet amsl.
Well MW-21 was known to be obstructed at an elevation of approximately 803 to 807 feet amsl. An attempt to clear this well was also made. However, it was not entirely successful since it appeared that some of the material obstructing the well was pushed to the bottom of the well and closed some of the bottom off.
After modifying the wells, new water level measurements were taken. The levels were taken twice on 8/1/2003, once in the morning and once in the afternoon. The data is shown below
.| Well | Time | DTW | Elevation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 10:35 | 68.52 | 816.42 |
| 4s | 10:37 | 71.72 | 815.9 |
| 21 | 10:42 | 69.15 | 816.26 |
| 4i | 10:43 | 69.2 | 816.86 |
| 20 | 10:45 | 68.99 | 816.26 |
| 18 | 10:51 | 68.15 | 817.05 |
| 17 | > 13:17 | 68.46 | 816.48 |
| 4s | 13:20 | 71.72 | 815.9 |
| 21 | 13:22 | 69.16 | 816.25 |
| 4i | 13:25 | 69.2 | 816.86 |
| 16 | 13:31 | 64.63 | 816.89 |
| 18 | 13:29 | 68.15 | 817.05 |
| 20 | 13:28 | 69.02 | 816.23 |
| 18 | 13:33 | 62.63 | 816.92 |
The data shows that wells MW- 17, MW-20 and MW-21 are now maintaining a lower level than well MW-4I. This has not historically been the case. There are two possibilities that could explain this. First, this may indicate that water in this area of the site has an upward gradient from the 795 to 800 zone (well MW-4I is still exposed to the 795 to 800 zone) to a higher phreatic level. Second, it could simply mean that the main water bearing zone at these wells is the 795 to 800 zone and if a well is blocked off from this zone, it will be mostly isolated and not show full system pressure. Since all dyes injected in the east side wells have traveled to the MW-4I well area, and dye injected deep in the 795 to 800 horizon has traveled to the Illinois Central Spring with timing similar to the PCB travel time, it is important to understand the flow patterns in this area.
The dye data indicates that the MW-4I area is a collecting, point for waters in the 795 to 800 zone and the new level data may indicate that this water then upwells to a higher phreatic zone in the vicinity of MW-4I. It is therefore important to sort out whether this upwelling is really occurring or the new water levels in MW-17. MW-21 and MW-20 are just an anomaly caused by poor connection to the water bearing zone.
To sort this out, the response of MW-20 and MW-17 will be monitored during storms and flush tests to see if the water levels respond as they should if they have maintained a good connection to the phreatic conduits.
Shallow well dye injections were conducted on 7/8/2003 in new wells PZ-H and PZ-I. Rhodamine was injected in PZ-H and fluorescein in PZ-I. The work was conducted in accordance with the test plan distributed to all parties on 7/2/2003. The goal of shallow dye injections is to assess where the epikarst waters flow and to determine if the pathway these waters take can be detected in phreatic wells.
The well sample dye results are shown in Tables 7 and 8. The data shows that both dyes arrived at wells 00-370 and 00-300A in Valhalla Cemetery. About a day and a half after injection, a large storm event occurred. This storm has confounded the analysis of the dye recovery data. For example, the morning after the rain, both dyes appeared in wells 00-300, MW-15, and fluorescein appeared in wells MW1O, MW20, MW41, and PZF.
Both dyes were detected at Illinois Central Spring. This data is shown in Figure 6. The arrivals coincided with a storm pulse at the spring. Three inches of rain fell on 7/9/2003 (the day after dye injection). Rhodamine arrived 38 hours after injection followed by the fluorescein an hour later. The average Illinois Central flow rate from injection to dye detection at the spring was 60 gpm (this is a geometric mean flow since the flow frequency distribution is highly non-normal because of the storm event). The expected PCB travel time for this average flow rate is 36 hours. The actual travel time agrees with the predicted travel time within 10% which is considered excellent. Fluorescein also arrived at the spring the same time as the PCB rise during the storm. This is curious since both dyes were in the phreatic system well ahead of the storm pulse. The expectation is that both dyes should have beaten the PCB storm pulse to the spring. In addition it appears the PCB storm pulse arrived earlier than expected.
The shapes of the dye breakthrough curves are different for the two dyes. Although both curves are sharp, the fluoroscein has a much sharper curve than the rhodamine. This indicates a better connection with the conduit system for the PZ-I area than the PZ-H area. It is not known if this is simply a function of the actual PZ location/connection to the sink feature or a true indication of the general sink connection to the conduit. However, in pre- injection testing, PZ-H took water at 25 gpm whereas PZ-I took water at only 8 gpm. This would indicate that the difference in breakthrough curves is more related to overall sinkhole connections rather than a local well phenomenon.
There are several possible explanations for the concurrent arrival of fluorescein and PCBs at Illinois Central Spring. First, it could be that it is mere coincidence that the fluorescein arrived coincident with the PCB storm pulse. There is some data scatter in expected PCB arrival times during storms and the PCBs could have been accelerated beyond their normal expected travel times because of some unknown storm specific reason such as the high intensity of the initial rain period of this particular storm. Second, the early arrival of the PCB pulse for this storm could have been caused by the flush of water accompanying the dye injection at PZ-I. This would imply that the PZ-I area is a major PCB transport source. Third, there was a smaller storm event that occurred the afternoon of 7/9/2003. This small storm event changed flows at Illinois Central Spring from 50 gpm to about 200 gpm and could be responsible for the apparent early arrival of PCBs.
The average flow rate was 299 gpm from the first spring response for the small storm until the PCBs arrived at Illinois Central Spring. The predicted travel time for 300 gpm is about 9 hours. The actual travel time from the small storm initiation was 6 hours. This is more than a 10% difference from expected arrivals and makes the third scenario suspect.
The two storms have confounded the analysis of the arrival/travel times. The average flow rate for the second more intense storm period from the time of initial spring response to PCB arrival at the spring is 645 gpm. The PCB travel time relationship previously developed would predict a travel time of 4.7 hours for this flow rate. The actual arrival time was approximately 2 hours. This appears to be early, lending credence to the second scenario above.
A number of well level instruments were employed during the dye injection period. The change in level after injection is an indication of when the dye and flush water entered the phreatic zone. Figure 7 shows the response at wells MW-6 and MW-4I. It appears that the flushing water entered the phreatic zone within 5 minutes after injection and that the flush to the phreatic zone was complete within 2 hours. This implies that the dyes were in the phreatic conduit system well ahead of the storm event. This again would lead one to expect that the dyes should have arrived ahead of a normal storm induced PCB pulse during the subsequent storm.
The concurrent arrival of PCBs and fluorescein at Illinois Central Spring along with the apparent early arrival of the PCB storm pulse implies that more investigation is warranted for the PZ-I area. A larger volume flush and dye injection during a stable flow period is indicated to see if a PCB pulse is initiated at the spring.
These shallow wells were injected on the morning of 7/24/2003. Rhodamine was injected in PZ-J and fluorescein into LF-1. During injection, a significant spillage of fluorescein occurred resulting in approximately 25% of the planned amount of fluorescein actually entering the well.
The well sample dye results are shown in Tables 9 and 10. Both dyes were detected at wells MW-19 and MW-16 within 4 hours of injection. Rhotlamine also appeared in wells MW-4I and MW-20 by the evening of 7/24/2003. Fluorescein also showed up in well PZ-E by the evening of 7/24/2003 and wells 00-370 and possibly 00-300A by the next morning.
Both dyes were detected at Illinois Central Spring. This data is shown in Figure 8. The rhodamine arrived at Illinois Central Spring at 02200 on 7/25/2003. The average spring flow from injection to arrival was about 254 gpm. The predicted PCB travel time for this flow rate would be 10.4 hours. The actual dye travel time was 15 to 16 hours. The peak dye concentration for rhodamine was only 10 ppb. This is a weak peak concentration. The dye recovery curve is also somewhat drawn out compared to a typical PCB storm pulse curve.
The fluorescein arrived at the Illinois Central Spring at about 0700 on 7/25/2003. This is a travel time of approximately 19 to 20 hours. The average flow during this time period was 249 gpm which yields a predicted travel time of 10.6 hours. The peak dye concentration was only about 2 ppb. The dye recovery curve is also very drawn out.
Well levels monitored during the dye injection included MW-6 and MW-4I. The levels during and after injection are shown in Figure 9. These levels do not show a definite response in the phreatic zone. However, there is a rather small slope change in the well levels that appears to last from about 10:00 am to 10:00 pm. This indicates that these dyes were injected into the epikarst and did not travel as quickly to the phreatic zone as the injection into PZ-H and PZ-I. This is consistent with the delayed travel time and small response at the Illinois Central Spring. This response indicates that these zones are indeed perched and have only slow leakage to the phreatic zone under non-storm conditions.
The dye recovered in wells MW-19 and MW-16 is thought to have arrived in the well by leaking down the well bore from the epikarst. It is known that both these wells have active leakage in the well bore from the 852 conduit zones. The 852 conduit zone is the water producing zone that received both dyes injected in PZ-J and LF- I. Previous testing of this zone at the old LF-1 and LF-5 showed a weak connection between these wells and indicated the overall gradient to the south. This data is consistent with this gradient. The strongest dye detection was for fluorescein in PZ-E which is both south and west of LF-I. The strongest detection of rhodamine was in well MW-19 which is south of PZ-J.
It is suspected that a good deal of the dyes injected in these wells is still hung up in the epikarst zones. These may provide a continuous slow leakage source to the spring, raising the general background levels.
Since injection of these wells, the rhodamine background has remained elevated in wells MW-19 and MW-20. Elevated backgrounds of both dyes persist in wells 00-300 and NN-300. Well LF-1 is shown to have very high PCB levels. If this well is in a perched aquifer that is slowly leaking to the phreatic zone, then this perched aquifer could be a continual source of PCBs to Illinois Central Spring.
E. Storm Event Five Minute Well Data:
A large storm occurred on 6/13/2003. The following wells were monitored on a 5 minute interval during this event:
MW-6
MW-B1
MW-19
MW-16
MW-4S
MW-17
MW-18
00-300
NN-700
Plots of the data are shown in Figures 10 to 13. As can be seen in Figure 10, the storm totaled about 1.46 inches of rain and came in two intervals. The first interval contained over an inch of rain and the second interval about .4 inches.
Referring to the water level plot in Figure 10, MW-6 again has the largest level change during the storm. It is surprising to see the level differential between MW-B1 and MW-6 that develops during the storm since these wells are only a few feet apart. It should be noted that although both wells are screened in the phreatic zone, MW-6 is screened from about 793 to 818 and MW-B1 is screened from about 790 to 795.
Referring to the temperature plot in Figure 11, MW-I9 had the largest temperature change during the storm. Also, of particular note is the sharp rise in temperature seen in MW-6 (see Figure 12) during the first 15 minutes of level rise before the temperature then falls. Conductivity at MW-6, shown in Figure 13, also shows a sharp initial quick rise prior to falling after the first five minutes. The data for MW-6 shows details of temperature and conductivity responses during the storm not previously seen in hourly data. The instrument in MW-BI was installed at the 814 elevation. This is well above the screened interval, indicating that the temperature response in this well is strictly caused by displacement of water up from the screened interval.
The response at MW-6 is different enough from previous hourly records to warrant taking additional 5 minute data during other events in this and other wells. Which wells are instrumented during each storm and where within the well column the instrument will be located will be changed to gather data on specific zones of interest.
COPA P.O. Box 665 Bloomington, IN 47402-0665 USA For more info, e-mail info at copa.org. Copyright © 1990-2002 COPA, Inc. All rights reserved. See legal page for terms of use and disclaimers. All trademarks belong to their respective owners. |
|||