CITIZENS INFORMATION COMMITTEE MINUTES OF APRIL 20, 1993 MEETING Attendees John Foster, Bloomington Environmental Commission Joe Hailer, Coalition Opposed to PCB Ash George Hegeman, Monroe County Board of Health Diane Henshel, IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs Dawn Hewitt, Near Westside Neighborhood; The Audubon Society Dan Hopkins, U.S. EPA Remedial Project Manager John Langley, Bloomington PCB Coordinator Iris Kiesling, Bloomington City Council Joe Loop representing Rachael Loop, Indiana Public Interest Research Group Rex Osborn, Indiana Department of Environmental Management John Perrecone, U.S. EPA Community Relations Coordinator Rob Stone, Physicians for Social Responsibility Not Present Lee Caulfield, Bloomington Rotary Lynn Coyne, Bloomington Chamber of Commerce Sally Hegeman, League of Women Voters Michael List, Private Citizen, Chair Brian Pence, People Against the Incinerator Amy Roche, Student Environmental Action Coalition Jordan Shifriss, Harmony School Approximately 11 observers attended the meeting. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. by George Hegeman who sat in for Chair, Michael List. Approval of Minutes Hopkins said that Page 2, Paragraph 10 said "EPA has had" and should say "EPA has seen". The minutes were approved as amended. Permitting Activities Hopkins said that there were no updates for permitting activities. Remedial Activities Hopkins updated everyone on the remedial activities at the ABB Plant. Westinghouse installed 20 piezometers to determine the potentiometric surface water levels, flow patterns and whether or not ground water is contaminated. Hopkins said that Westinghouse plans to begin excavation of the remaining areas at the ABB Plant on May 7th. He also said that Westinghouse asked if they could take some of the excavated material to a permitted landfill. EPA is reviewing that request. Hopkins said that on April 7, 1993, EPA took public officials and CIC members on an outdoor site tour of the ABB Plant. He said that it gave everyone an opportunity to see the excavated areas that he had been discussing at previous meetings. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) Update Louise Fabinski ATSDR Senior Regional Representative, a part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. He introduced the agency panel co-chairs that will be working on the Bloomington Health Assessments. Ms. Fabinski said that ATSDR had met with Greg Steele to get an historical perspective and Hopkins had given them site tours. She said that ATSDR would be conducting the health assessments for the consent decree sites as mandated by Congress. She said that they would also look at the Fell Iron and Metal and ABB Plant sites as an addendum but it would be later. Ms. Fabinski will be back to collect videotape footage of the sites. She said that ATSDR would like to invite citizens to show them the areas they wanted the committee to see. ATSDR is accepting nominations to fill the expert panel seats until April 30th, and those can be submitted to her. ATSDR would also like to know if the community has ideas for how ATSDR can get their information out to the public. Dr. Allan Susten, overall Project Manager for the Bloomington Project from ATSDR, said that they have a cooperative agreement with the Indiana State Department of Health to assist with this project. He said that the public health assessment is an evaluation of existing data and information and what health outcomes have occurred. He said that there are three purposes to the project: to evaluate the public health impact of six Bloomington hazardous wastes sites containing PCB-contaminated soil; to determine the public health implications of incinerating the PCB-contaminated soil; and to identify and evaluate public health considerations of technically feasible treatment alternatives, including the no action alternative. Dr. Susten said that they will identify whether or not community and physician education is needed. Susten said that ATSDR's approach is to convene three expert panels: health; incineration; and alternate technologies. They expect to select approximately 10 to 15 experts for the health; 7-10 for each of the other two. These panels will be balanced with representation from academia, government, industry, citizens, and scientists outside of ATSDR. ATSDR will be selecting the panel representatives after all of the nominations have been submitted. The deadline for nomination submittals is April 30, 1993. Susten said that the co-chairs will review all studies that have been completed in Bloomington. They will then submit their questions to the panel members. The panelists will review the reports, answer the questions in writing, and attend a meeting. The meeting has not been scheduled but is anticipated to be in mid-September. Susten said that ATSDR is not seeking consensus but information and input. ATSDR will take full responsibility for the final report. He said that they will not make recommendations proclaiming one technology as more suitable than another or make mention of the consent decree. Dr. Susten said that was out of the ATSDR scope. Fabinski said in order that ATSDR get the health assessments done in a timely manner, Fell Iron and Metal and the ABB plant site would be done in a later amendment. She said that they would not be ignored. Henshel asked if EPA would be on the panels. Dr. Susten said that there would be representatives from EPA on the panels because there are many qualified scientists that work at EPA. Foster asked if they would look at priority pollutants. Susten said they would be looking at all existing reports. Michael Conner asked if ATSDR would make recommendations or decisions. Susten said that ATSDR is not a regulatory agency so they cannot set policy but they can make some recommendations. Fabinski added that ATSDR will be looking at technically feasible alternatives including incineration of PCBs and the no-action alternative, with a focus on protection of public health. Foster asked if ATSDR is funded by Superfund. Susten said that they are funded by the U.S. Public Health Service. Status of COPA's FOIA Request Hopkins said that EPA has delivered 15 of the 28 boxes of information that COPA requested. He said that EPA has had problems with copiers breaking down and they are trying to get the remainder of copies made so they can be delivered to COPA. Fell Iron and Metal Hopkins said that EPA has reached a decision about Fell. He said that essentially that the remedy is a two-part solution. He said that Westinghouse and Fell shall incinerate or arrange to incinerate the PCB-contaminated soils and materials using the Bloomington incinerator (Plan A) or an appropriately permitted commercial incinerator (Plan B). (A) can be done if the following five conditions are met: 1) Westinghouse receives written approval within six months after the Decision Document issuance date which selects and identifies the remedy for the site from the State, Monroe County, and the City of Bloomington, to allow the Fell materials to be incinerated in the Bloomington incinerator; 2) all permits, approvals, and certificates necessary to construct the Bloomington Incinerator are obtained on or before March 15, 1995; 3) construction of the Bloomington incinerator begins on or before July 15, 1995; 4) all incinerator permits, approvals, and certificates necessary to operate the Bloomington incinerator are obtained by April 15, 1996; and 5) incineration of the materials specifically identified in the Consent Decree begins in the Bloomington incinerator by July 15, 1996. If any of these 5 deadlines are not met, Westinghouse must dispose of the Fell materials in a permitted commercial incinerator. NOTE: Hopkins said that there may be a typographical error in the dates and he will check into that and let the CIC members know at the next meeting. Dave Porter asked Hopkins why EPA did not just ask Westinghouse to haul the Fell materials away instead of making them go through this maze? Hopkins said that EPA is giving Westinghouse an opportunity to use the Bloomington incinerator first. Dawn Hewitt asked if the Decision Document outlines the safety conditions, method of transportation and routes, and excavation plans in the event that Plan B is selected. Hopkins said no but Westinghouse would have to provide a work plan describing those things if Plan B were chosen. Hewitt asked if there are guidelines for what Westinghouse's work plan should contain. Hopkins said that there are some guidelines and regulations such as the Department of Transportation requirements that would need to be followed but other than that there are no written guidelines for a work plan. Hewitt asked if the public would get to comment on Westinghouse's work plan. Hopkins doesn't see a problem with the public commenting on the work plan even though it is not a normal procedure. Deane Little's Presentation to the Consent Decree Parties Hopkins mentioned that he had discussed with Deane Little the idea of submitting his Winston-Thomas data to EPA and Westinghouse's technical people and then be prepared to give a presentation if the consent decree parties are interested. Hopkins received additional materials from Little and Hopkins will submit this to the other consent decree parties to see if they are interested in talking to Little further. Rob Stone asked if Little ever got a handle on the volatilization of PCBs at Winston-Thomas. George Hegeman said that there did not seem to be volatilization. He said that the lab was sent the whole flask for sampling so that the PCBs did not have an opportunity to volatilize. Henshel said that she has the guidelines for how ATSDR conducts health assessments and she would like EPA to make copies and provide them to the repositories and the local EPA office. Perrecone said that Henshel could give them to Sona Chambers and EPA would provide the copies. New Business Joe Loop wanted to know if additional testing can be done at ICS and Quarry Springs since it has been almost two years since sampling has been done there. He would like to have the area fenced since children are playing there and he feels that they may be exposed. Hopkins said that fencing in that area is not justified since the statutory thresholds are not being exceeded. Foster asked Perrecone to defend his paper that was presented at the Superfund conference in D.C. Perrecone said that he wrote what he felt to be an accurate portrayal of the situation and thought it was respectful of the Bloomington community. He said he felt badly that people are taking sections of it out of context and misrepresenting what he intended. Perrecone announced that he would be working in a new capacity as the EPA Region 5 Geographic Initiatives Coordinator for Public Affairs beginning May 1, 1993. EPA will be assigning another Community Relations Coordinator to the Bloomington Project. He reiterated that he is very respectful of the Bloomington community and hopes they will continue to question EPA so that they can do their jobs better, and be more responsive to community concerns. Perrecone showed a videotape detailing the Indiana Woodtreating Plant creosote cleanup that EPA conducted. The videotape may be checked out at any time from the local EPA office. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned by George Hegeman at 9:22 p.m. The next meeting will be held Tuesday, June 1, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in Room 246-248 at IU's Jordan Hall. There is parking available in the Atwater Parking Garage for $1 if you bring your parking ticket to the CIC meeting and have it validated. A future CIC meetings will be held Tuesday, July 13th, 1993. Adapted minutes recorded by Sona Chambers, U.S. EPA Region 5 Public Information Center, staffed by Jacobs Engineering Group.